Skip to content


Working together for a common good?

Partnerships are a tricky thing in Social Marketing, especially when the partnerships are between a commercial organisation and a non-profit or governmental organisation. Some academics (see Previte & Fry, 2006 for examples) have argued that any collaboration of industry and non-profits may be harmful. Others, have taken a more balanced approach. Yet, in all industry/non-profit partnerships there is a potential ethical problem of who is making money from what. Take for example the recently launched Lose smoker1The Smoker campaign - a campaign that promotes quitting smoking and is a partnership between Quit and Pfizer. Would it have been possible to produce high quality videos, websites and a great viral marketing campaign without the support of the industry? Both organisations want people to stop smoking - the one by providing a Quitline service, the other by selling nicotine replacement therapies. But, as long as both organisations have the same aim, is it ok to share resources? Maybe in this case, one could argue, is a partnership beneficial to both sides (but arguably less beneficial to the NHS if people ask for treatment which they may not need as a result of the campaign). But what about other cases?
How about the Drinkaware campaigns promoting responsible drinking, funded largely by the drinks industry? How about the MediaSmart campaigns, teaching children how to “read” advertising, funded by the advertising industry? The real question is how effective can these campaigns be, if they are directly opposite to the commercial aims of the supporting industry. Should social marketeers enter into a partnership with this type of organisations? Surely there are no straight forward answers on this, but caution is probably needed.

Share this
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Ping.fm
  • LinkedIn
  • Live

Related posts:

  1. Using KTPs for Social Marketing In times of funding cuts across the board, accessing a little extra help may be a particularly good idea for organisations especially in the public, non-profit and health sector. Even...
  2. Scaring you out of Smoking… The NHS Birmingham East and North has launched a new social marketing campaign aimed at hardened smokers from a deprived background. The adverts accompanying the campaign are - to...
  3. ASA & Climate Change The British Advertising Standards Authority has today ruled against two press adverts for the “Act on CO2″ campaign ( the ruling can be found here) . The two posters,...
  4. Shockingly bad - maybe Yesterday I received an email from America. It was asking me, given my negative stance on shock tactics in this post, what I was thinking about an anti-obesity campaign currently...
  5. Social Marketing and Crime Prevention Social Marketing is more and more moving out of the health area and being used for other social issues. One of them is crime prevention. Yet, while there are plenty...

Posted in Marketing Communications, Social Marketing. Tagged with , , , , .

4 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Daniel Reeders said

    I’m intrigued by a finding in Witte & Allan’s (2000) meta-analysis of studies into fear appeals, which found their efficacy had been increasing over the years. Witte has taken part in cross-cultural research into fear appeals which found they barely worked at all in comparison cultures (Hispanic and Taiwanese, from memory). Putting those two findings together, I think Western culture has been teaching itself literacy in a particular kind of social marketing. In Australia, we’ve seen similar industry–NGO collaborations, and there’s an article questioning them in today’s Age, in fact (http://www.theage.com.au/national/heres-jeers-20091204-kb2e.html). If increased literacy means increased efficacy of a given marketing tactic, then it can be in the industry’s interests to set that up for future product marketing campaigns. Consequently, in Australia, we now see Nicabate advertisements giving a quasi-medical explanation of how nicotine receptors work, concluding this makes it impossible to quit under your own will power.

  2. name said

    I like your work!,

  3. Nicotine is one of the most addicting substance in this world so avoid smoking cigarettes.~`”

  4. Allison Hill said

    oh well, nicotine is the number cause of lung disease. this substance can really kill your lungs.~:`

Some HTML is OK

(required)

(required, but never shared)

or, reply to this post via trackback.